COMMUNICATE SCIENCE IN THE CONTEXT OF TOURISM AND GEOEDUCATION STRATEGIES. THE INTERPRETIVE PANELS OF THE UNESCO GLOBAL GEOPARK STAR
Article Sidebar
Main Article Content
Abstract
Science communication is a key tool for enhancing the value of geological heritage, promoting geo-education and developing sustainable tourism in areas designated as UNESCO Global Geoparks. The aim of this study is to analyse the science communication strategies implemented by the Estrela UNESCO Global Geopark, with a particular focus on the network of interpretative panels as a resource for landscape interpretation, environmental education and the promotion of tourism. Methodologically, a qualitative approach of a descriptive and exploratory nature was adopted, using a case study involving documentary analysis, non-participant direct observation and content analysis of the 19 interpretive panels located at 28 geosites within the area. The results show that these communication tools combine scientific, educational, heritage and tourism information, using accessible language, visual resources, bilingual content and digital tools that facilitate an understanding of geodiversity among different audiences. It is concluded that the Estrela Geopark’s interpretive strategy helps to strengthen scientific literacy, promote geoconservation, enhance the tourist experience and add value to the region, demonstrating that science communication is a strategic element in the sustainable management of nature-based destinations
Downloads
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in e3 – Journal of Economics, Business and Entrepreneurship in the community of Portuguese-speaking countries are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
This license allows users to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
Funding data
-
Investigaçao financiada pela FCT (Fundaçao para a Ciencia e Tecnologia), referência UID/04470/2025 projeto CITUR -Centro de Investigação, Desenvolvimento e Inovação em Turismo, com o DOI https://doi.org/10.54499/UID/04470/2025.
References
Colley, H., Hodkinson, P., & Malcolm, L. (2003). Informality and formality in learning: A report for the Learning and Skills Research Centre. Learning and Skills Research Centre.
Čtveráková, I., Fialová, D., Kučera, Z., & Chromý, P. (2016). Barriers in functioning of Czech geoparks in the context of different circumstances. AUC Geographica, 51(2), 235–246. https://doi.org/10.14712/23361980.2016.19
Dowling, R. K. (2011). Geotourism’s global growth. Geoheritage, 3, 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-010-0024-7
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C., & Costa, C. (2012). Geotourism and geoparks as gateways to socio-cultural sustainability in Qeshm rural areas, Iran. Asia Pacific Journal of Tourism Research, 17, 30–48.
Farsani, N. T., Coelho, C. O., Costa, C. M., & Amrikazemi, A. (2014). Geo-knowledge management and geoconservation via geoparks and geotourism. Geoheritage, 6, 185–192.
Fernandes, G., Tracana, R. B., Castro, E., & Fernandes, M. (2021). Geoeducation and tourism in Estrela UNESCO Global Geopark (Portugal) and its contributions to the construction of a sustainable destination. In A. Mandić & L. Petrić (Eds.), Mediterranean protected areas in the era of overtourism (pp. 137–152). Springer.
Fernandes, G. P., Castro, E., Gomes, H., & Fernandes, M. (2021). New training contexts for geoeducation and tourism: Action and education strategies in the qualification of Estrela Geopark communities in Portugal. In V. G. Costa, A. A. Moura, & M. Mira (Eds.), Handbook of research on human capital and people management in the tourism industry (pp. 329–349). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-4318-4.ch016
Fordham, P. E. (1993). Informal, non-formal and formal education programmes in YMCA George Williams College ICE301 Lifelong Learning Unit 2. YMCA George Williams College.
Festeu, D., & Humberstone, B. (2006). Non-formal education through outdoor activities guide. European Institute for Outdoor Adventure Education and Experiential Learning.
Ham, S. H. (2013). Interpretation: Making a difference on purpose. Fulcrum Publishing.
Henriques, M. H., Reis, R., Brilha, J., & Mota, T. (2011). Geoconservation as an emerging geoscience. Geoheritage, 3, 117–128. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0039-8
Higuchi, M. I. G., Zattoni, M., & Bueno, F. P. (2012). Educação ambiental em contextos não escolares: Definindo, problematizando e exemplificando. Pesquisa em Educação Ambiental, 7(2), 119–132.
Hose, T. A. (2005). Geoturismo europeo: Interpretación geológica y promoción de la conservación geológica para turistas. In D. Barretino, W. A. P. Wimbledon, & E. Gallego (Eds.), Patrimonio geológico: Conservación y gestión. Instituto Tecnológico Geominero de España.
Hose, T. A. (2012). 3G’s for modern geotourism. Geoheritage, 4(1–2), 7–24. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-011-0052-y
Macadam, J. (2018). Interpretation: By design (2nd ed.). MuseumsEtc.
Novaes, V., & Pena, L. (2016). Reflections on the development of Geopark projects from the territory and tourism perspectives. Cenário, 6, 139–155.
Orion, N. (2001). A educação em Ciências da Terra: Da teoria à prática — implementação de novas estratégias de ensino em diferentes ambientes de aprendizagem. In L. Marques & J. Praia (Orgs.), Geociências nos currículos dos ensinos básico e secundário (pp. 93–114). Universidade de Aveiro.
Rodrigues, J., Costa e Silva, E., & Pereira, D. I. (2023). How can geoscience communication foster public engagement with geoconservation? Geoheritage, 15(1), Article 32. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-023-00825-5
Santos, S. S., Pedrosa, K. M., Andrade, E. S., Silva, J. S., Rodrigues, E. F., & Xavier, W. J. (2020). Trilhas interpretativas utilizadas como recurso pedagógico: Formação e informação no ensino básico. Revista Brasileira de Gestão Ambiental e Sustentabilidade, 7(16), 749–769. https://doi.org/10.21438/rbgas(2020)071621
Santos, C. M., Lopes, E. A. M., Passipieri, M., & Dornfeld, C. B. (2012). Oficina de interpretação ambiental com alunos do ensino fundamental na “Trilha do Jatobá” em Ilha Solteira, SP. Revista Eletrônica de Educação, 6(2).
Santos, M. C., Flores, M. D., & Zanin, M. D. (2011). Trilhas interpretativas como instrumento de interpretação, sensibilização e educação ambiental na APAE de Erechim/RS. Vivências, 7(13), 189–197.
Serrano, E., & Trueba, J. J. G. (2011). Environmental education and landscape leisure: A geotourist map and geomorphosites in the Picos de Europa National Park. GeoJournal of Tourism and Geosites, 8(2), 295–308.
Singtuen, V., Vivitkul, N., & Junjuer, T. (2022). Geoeducational assessments in Khon Kaen National Geopark, Thailand: Implication for geoconservation and geotourism development. Heliyon, 8(12).
Stocklmayer, S. M., Rennie, L. J., & Gilbert, J. K. (2010). The roles of the formal and informal sectors in the provision of effective science education. Studies in Science Education, 46(1), 1–44.
Štrba, L., & Palgutová, K. (2024). Assessment of interpretive panels in UNESCO Global Geoparks: Towards more effective geoscience communication. Geoheritage, 16, Article 71. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12371-024-01012-1
Tracana, R. T., Fernandes, G., Castro, E., & Fernandes, M. (2021). Geoeducação e práticas pedagógicas na valorização do território: O Estrela Geopark (Portugal) como recurso didático e suas estratégias de divulgação das geociências e do geoturismo. In V. R. Brancher, K. Drehmer-Marques, & S. E. Nonenmacher (Orgs.), Práticas e metodologias no ensino de ciências. Metrics. https://doi.org/10.46550/978-65-89700-33-3
UNESCO. (2023). UNESCO Global Geoparks and geotourism toolkit: Developing and managing sustainable tourism. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/
Zouros, N. (2004). The European Geoparks Network: Geological heritage protection and local development. Episodes, 27(3), 165–171.