VALORIZING BIOCULTURAL RESOURCES THROUGH EXPERIENTIAL LEARNING: COMMUNITY-BASED RURAL TOURISM IN SOUTHERN ECUADOR
Main Article Content
Abstract
This article analyzes the valorization of biocultural resources in the Mancomunidad de las Meliponas (Inter-Municipal Association), in southern Ecuador, from a community-based rural tourism perspective, focusing on how a community engagement practicum shapes university students’ understanding of these resources and of the entrepreneurial opportunities associated with them. The study focuses on tourism students enrolled in a community engagement academic practice (April–August 2025) that produced technical assets for the Mancomunidad, later presented at the IV International Festival of Native Stingless Bees; some students travelled to the territory and engaged directly with producers and practices related to meliponiculture, while others participated remotely. A qualitative case study design with descriptive support was adopted. Data were collected through two online questionnaires with closed- and open-ended questions, answered at the beginning (n = 22) and at the end (n = 15) of the practice, and were examined through thematic content analysis; the fifthteen post-practice responses were matched with their pre-practice responses, and six of these students had travelled to the territory. This design is grounded in experiential learning, recognizing students as mediators in the construction of knowledge about the stingless bees agro-productive landscape. The results suggest a shift from a descriptive and fragmented understanding of local resources toward a more integrated view that links nature, culture, tourism and sustainability: references to tourism rose from 27% to 87% of answers and references to sustainability/development from 23% to 80%, while references to culture/identity declined. This shift was also observed among students who did not travel and may partly reflect a change in question wording; direct contact with the territory was mainly associated with more place-specific knowledge. The study contributes to understanding the educational dimension of biocultural resource valorization. Its implications for local entrepreneurship and territorial development, framed by the quadruple helix model, are potential rather than demonstrated and require further research that includes community stakeholders
Downloads
Article Details

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
All articles published in e3 – Journal of Economics, Business and Entrepreneurship in the community of Portuguese-speaking countries are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license.
This license allows users to share (copy and redistribute the material in any medium or format) and adapt (remix, transform, and build upon the material) for any purpose, including commercial use, provided that appropriate credit is given to the original author(s) and the journal, a link to the license is provided, and any changes made are indicated.
References
Alburquerque, F. (2004). Desarrollo económico local y descentralización en América Latina. Revista de la CEPAL, (82), 157–171. https://hdl.handle.net/11362/10946
Berkes, F. (2012). Sacred ecology (3rd ed.). Routledge.
Boisier, S. (2005). ¿Hay espacio para el desarrollo local en la globalización? Revista de la CEPAL, 86, 47–62.
Bourdieu, P. (1990). The logic of practice. Stanford University Press.
Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77–101.
Brundtland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. Oxford University Press.
Cabanilla, E. (2018). Turismo comunitario en América Latina, un concepto en construcción. Siembra, 5(1), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.29166/siembra.v5i1.1433
Carayannis, E. G., & Campbell, D. F. J. (2009). ‘Mode 3’ and ‘Quadruple Helix’. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3–4), 201–234. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
Carrera Bravo, M. A., Cobeña Macías, E. C., Ordoñez Piedra, J. C., & Zambrano, W. S. (2024). Estudio del patrimonio cultural y natural del Ecuador desde un enfoque turístico. Revista Ciencias Sociales y Económicas, 8(1), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.18779/csye.v8i1.693
Daldi Calabró, N., De Simón, C., & Balaguer Accolti, A. (2025). Reflexiones en torno a la puesta en valor turística del patrimonio cultural desde la perspectiva de género y la sostenibilidad. Aportes y Transferencias, 23(2), Artículo 0297.
Ellis, F. (2000). Rural livelihoods and diversity in developing countries. Oxford University Press.
Hernández-Silvera, D., & Ghilardelli, M. A. (2023). Paisajes digitales de aprendizaje en la universidad: Huellas vivenciales e inserción comunitaria. Revista Panamericana de Pedagogía, 35, 135–151. https://doi.org/10.21555/rpp.vi35.2727
Kolb, D. A. (1984). Experiential learning: Experience as the source of learning and development. Prentice Hall.
Lane, B. (2009). Rural tourism: An overview. In T. Jamal & M. Robinson (Eds.), The SAGE handbook of tourism studies (pp. 354–370). SAGE.
Lave, J., & Wenger, E. (1991). Situated learning: Legitimate peripheral participation. Cambridge University Press.
International Labour Organization. (2005). Pautas metodológicas para el análisis de experiencias de turismo comunitario (Working Paper No. 73, SEED). https://www.ilo.org/sites/default/files/wcmsp5/groups/public/%40ed_emp/%40emp_ent/%40ifp_seed/documents/publication/wcms_117525.pdf
Millennium Ecosystem Assessment. (2005). Ecosystems and human well-being: Synthesis. Island Press.
Oddone, N., Quiroga Barrera Oro, M., Sartori de Almeida Prado, H., & Williner, A. (2016). Pactos territoriales en la construcción de regiones transfronterizas: Por una mayor integración a múltiples niveles (Serie Desarrollo Territorial, N.º 20). Comisión Económica para América Latina y el Caribe (CEPAL).
Prats, L. (2005). Concepto y gestión del patrimonio local. Cuadernos de Antropología Social, (21), 17–35. https://www.scielo.org.ar/scielo.php?pid=S1850-275X2005000100002&script=sci_arttext
Ruiz-Ballesteros, E. (2011). Social-ecological resilience and community-based tourism. Tourism Management, 32(3), 655–666.
Ruiz-Ballesteros, E., & Hernández-Ramírez, M. (2010). Tourism that empowers? Journal of Sustainable Tourism, 18(4), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09669581003721239
Sachs, J. D. (2015). The age of sustainable development. Columbia University Press.
Sarmiento León, C. A. (2025). Turismo y conservación: Estrategias comunitarias para la protección de la biodiversidad amazónica. Ciencia Latina Revista Científica Multidisciplinar, 9(5). https://doi.org/10.37811/cl_rcm.v9i5.19990
Scheyvens, R. (1999). Ecotourism and the empowerment of local communities. Tourism Management, 20(2), 245–249. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0261-5177(98)00069-7
Smith, L. (2011). Uses of heritage. Routledge. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780203602263
Stålhammar, S., & Pedersen, E. (2017). Recreational cultural ecosystem services: How do people describe the value? Ecosystem Services, 26, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2017.05.010
Toledo, V. M., & Barrera-Bassols, N. (2008). La memoria biocultural: La importancia ecológica de las sabidurías tradicionales. Icaria.
Troncoso, C. (2012). Patrimonio, turismo y usos del pasado. Revista de Estudios Sociales, (44), 45–58. https://doi.org/10.7440/res44.2012.05
UNESCO. (2003). Convención para la salvaguardia del patrimonio cultural inmaterial. UNESCO.
Vázquez Barquero, A. (2007). Desarrollo endógeno: Teorías y políticas de desarrollo territorial. Investigaciones Regionales, (11), 183–210. http://www.redalyc.org/articulo.oa?id=28901109
Villalba Ferreira, M., Dijkstra, G., Scholten, P., & Sucozhañay, D. (2022). The effectiveness of inter-municipal cooperation for integrated sustainable waste management: A case study in Ecuador. Waste Management, 150, 208–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2022.07.008
Yin, R. K. (2018). Case study research and applications: Design and methods (6th ed.). SAGE.