THE IMPACT OF ACCOUNTING AUTOMATION ON INFORMATION QUALITY AND CORPORATE SOCIAL RESPONSIBILITY
Contenido principal del artículo
Resumen
Este estudio evalúa la adopción de las herramientas de automatización contable e identifica los factores que influyen en ella y su impacto en la calidad de la información contable y de los sistemas de información. Además, este estudio analiza el efecto del compromiso de la empresa con la responsabilidad social en la intención de utilizar herramientas de automatización contable y en la calidad de la información contable.
Un modelo conceptual guía la investigación, fundamentando las preguntas de investigación y las hipótesis relativas al uso de las siguientes herramientas de automatización contable: Automatización Robótica de Procesos (RPA); Inteligencia Artificial; Big Data: y Blockchain. Los datos se recogieron mediante un cuestionario dirigido a contables portugueses y se analizaron utilizando la técnica del modelo de ecuaciones estructurales.
Según el Modelo de Aceptación de la Tecnología, los resultados muestran que la facilidad de uso percibida y la utilidad percibida influyen positivamente en la intención de uso de todas las herramientas de automatización contable analizadas. En el ámbito de la Teoría del Comportamiento Planificado, esta investigación revela que la intención de uso es decisiva para la adopción de la tecnología de Automatización Robótica de Procesos (RPA). En consecuencia, el uso de la RPA tiene un impacto positivo en la calidad de los sistemas de información contable y de la información contable. La responsabilidad social emerge como un notable impulsor de la intención de uso de Blockchain y de la mejora de la calidad de la Información Contable para todas las herramientas de Automatización Contable. RPA demuestra ser la herramienta más importante para el área de contabilidad, teniendo en cuenta el modelo y la teoría utilizados en esta investigación.
Esta investigación es crucial para las organizaciones que aprovechan el potencial de la automatización en el ámbito contable. Al desentrañar la intrincada relación entre las herramientas de Automatización Contable y la calidad de la Información Contable y de los Sistemas de Información, este estudio orienta las decisiones estratégicas, la asignación de recursos y la integración tecnológica en contabilidad.
Descargas
Detalles del artículo

Esta obra está bajo una licencia internacional Creative Commons Atribución 4.0.
Todos los artículos publicados en la e3 – Revista de Economía, Empresas y Emprendimiento en la CPLP se distribuyen bajo la licencia Creative Commons Atribución (CC BY).
Esta licencia permite compartir (copiar y redistribuir el material en cualquier medio o formato) y adaptar (remezclar, transformar y crear a partir del material) para cualquier propósito, incluso comercial, siempre que se otorgue el crédito adecuado a los autores y a la revista, se proporcione un enlace a la licencia y se indiquen los cambios realizados.
Citas
Abad-Segura, E., González-Zamar, M. D., 2020. Research analysis on emerging technologies in corporate accounting. Mathematics, 8(9), 1589.
Abdelraheem, A., Hussaien, A., Mohammed, M., Elbokhari, Y., 2021. The effect of information technology on the quality of accounting information. Accounting, 7(1), 191-196.
Accenture, 2016. Getting robots right. How to avoid the six most damaging mistakes in scaling up robotic process automation.
Agarwal, R., Prasad, J., 1999. Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?. Decision sciences, 30(2), 361-391.
Algrari, A. Y., Ahmed, M. R. M., 2019. The impact of Accounting Information Systems’ Quality on Accounting Information Quality. Journal of Information Technology Management, 11(3), 62-80.
Al-Hiyari, A., Al-Mashregy, M. H. H., Mat, N. K., Alekam, J. E., 2013. Factors that affect accounting information system implementation and accounting information quality: A survey in University Utara Malaysia. American Journal of Economics, 3(1), 27-31.
Appelbaum, D., Kogan, A., & Vasarhelyi, M. A., 2017. Big Data and analytics in the modern audit engagement: Research needs. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 36(4), 1-27.
Arsenie-Samoil, M. 2010. The Impact of Using New Information Technologies on Accounting Organizations. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 10(1), 1695-1699.
Askary, S., Abu-Ghazaleh, N., & Tahat, Y. A., 2018. Artificial intelligence and reliability of accounting information. In Challenges and Opportunities in the Digital Era: 17th IFIP WG 6.11 Conference on e-Business, e-Services, and e-Society, I3E 2018, Kuwait City, Kuwait, October 30–November 1, 2018, Proceedings 17 (pp. 315-324). Springer International Publishing.
Baldwin, A. A., Brown, C. E., & Trinkle, B. S., 2006. Opportunities for artificial intelligence development in the accounting domain: the case for auditing. Intelligent Systems in Accounting, Finance & Management: International Journal, 14(3), 77-86.
Bekkhus, R., 2016. Do KPIs used by CIOs decelerate digital business transformation? The case of ITIL.
Bell, J., Waters, S., 2018. Ebook: doing your research project: a guide for first-time researchers. McGraw-hill education (UK).
Cai, C. W., 2021. Triple‐entry accounting with blockchain: How far have we come?. Accounting & Finance, 61(1), 71-93.
Chiu, V., Liu, Q., Muehlmann, B., & Baldwin, A. A., 2019). A bibliometric analysis of accounting information systems journals and their emerging technologies contributions. International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, 32, 24-43.
Choe, J. M., 2017. The strategic alignment of management accounting information systems, and organizational performance. Global Business & Finance Review (GBFR), 22(4), 50-64.
Cockcroft, S., and Russell, M., 2018. Big data opportunities for accounting and finance practice and research. Australian Accounting Review, 28(3), 323-333.
Cooper, L. A., Holderness Jr, D. K., Sorensen, T. L., Wood, D. A., 2019. Robotic process automation in public accounting. Accounting Horizons, 33(4), 15-35.
Coyne, J. G., McMickle, P. L., 2017. Can blockchains serve an accounting purpose?. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 14(2), 101-111.
Dai, J., Vasarhelyi, M. A., 2017. Toward blockchain-based accounting and assurance. Journal of information systems, 31(3), 5-21.
Cui, J., Jo, H., Na, H. (2018). Does corporate social responsibility affect information asymmetry?. Journal of business ethics, 148, 549-572.
Damerji, H., Salimi, A., 2021. Mediating effect of use perceptions on technology readiness and adoption of artificial intelligence in accounting. Accounting Education, 30(2), 107-130.
Davenport, T. H., Dyché, J., 2013. Big data in big companies. International Institute for Analytics, 3(1-31).
Davis, F. D., 1985. A technology acceptance model for empirically testing new end-user information systems: Theory and results (Doctoral dissertation, Massachusetts Institute of Technology).
Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS quarterly, 319-340.
Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., Warshaw, P. R., 1989. User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management science, 35(8), 982-1003.
Deepak, G. Jain, M., 2017. Impact of cloud accounting on business performance. International Research Journal of Commerce, Arts and Science, 8(12), 321-329.
Deloitte Consulting, U. K., 2015. The robots are coming: A Deloitte insight report.
DeLone, W. H., McLean, E. R., 1992. Information systems success: The quest for the dependent variable. Information systems research, 3(1), 60-95.
Fernandez, D., Aman, A., 2018. Impacts of robotic process automation on global accounting services. Asian Journal of Accounting & Governance, 9.
Fernández-Gago, R., Cabeza-García, L., & Nieto, M., 2016. Corporate social responsibility, board of directors, and firm performance: an analysis of their relationships. Review of Managerial Science, 10, 85-104.
Ferreira, C., Miranda, P., da Silva, A. F., & Goncalves, M. J. A., 2021. Accountants in the digital age, from private to public sector: A literature review. Economic and Social Development: Book of Proceedings, 93-103.
Fornell, C., Larcker, D., 1981. Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error. Journal of Marketing Research, 18(1), 39–50. https://doi.org/10.2307/3151312
Geddes, B. H., 2020. Emerging technologies in management accounting. Journal of Economics and Business, 3(1).
Gefen, D., Keil, M., 1998. The impact of developer responsiveness on perceptions of usefulness and ease of use: An extension of the technology acceptance model. Acm sigmis database: the database for advances in information systems, 29(2), 35-49.
Gölzer, P., Fritzsche, A., 2017. Data-driven operations management: organisational implications of the digital transformation in industrial practice. Production Planning & Control, 28(16), 1332-1343.
Gonçalves, J. P. D. C., 2022. Blockchain & Bitcoin-O Impacto na Contabilidade: Perspetivas de Contabilistas Certificados e Revisores Oficiais de Contas Portugueses (Doctoral dissertation, Universidade do Minho (Portugal)).
Gotthardt, M., Koivulaakso, D., Paksoy, O., Saramo, C., Martikainen, M., Lehner, O., 2020. Current state and challenges in the implementation of smart robotic process automation in accounting and auditing. ACRN Journal of Finance and Risk Perspectives, 9, 90-102.
Greenman, C., 2017. Exploring the impact of artificial intelligence on the accounting profession. Journal of Research in Business, Economics and Management, 8(3), 1451.
Hair, J., Hult, G., Ringle, C., Sarstedt, M., 2017. A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM). 2nd Ed. Sage, Thousand oaks.
Hair, J., Risher, J., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C., 2019. When to use and how to report the results of PLS-SEM. European Business Review, 31(1), 2–24. https://doi.org/10.1108/EBR-11-2018-020
Harrast, S. A. (2020). Robotic process automation in accounting systems. Journal of Corporate Accounting & Finance, 31(4), 209-213.
Hasan, A. R., 2021. Artificial Intelligence (AI) in accounting & auditing: A Literature review. Open Journal of Business and Management, 10(1), 440-465.
Henseler, J., Dijkstra, T. K., Sarstedt, M., Ringle, C. M., Diamantopoulos, A., Straub, D. W., Ketchen, D. J., Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T. M., & Calantone, R. J., 2014). Common Beliefs and Reality About PLS: Comments on Ronkko and Evermann (2013). Organizational Research Methods, 17(2), 182–209. https://doi.org/10.1177/1094428114526928
Huong, P. T., Duc, N. L., 2023. The Perceptions of Prospective Digital Transformation Adopters: An Extended Diffusion of Innovations Theory. TEM Journal, 12(1).
Ibrahim, A. E. A., Elamer, A. A., Ezat, A. N., 2021. The convergence of big data and accounting: Innovative research opportunities. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 173, 121171.
Id Bouichou, S., Wang, L., Zulfiqar, S., 2022. How perceived corporate social responsibility raises employees’ creative behaviors based on appraisal theory of emotion: the serial mediation model. Frontiers in Psychology, 13, 865007.
Igbaria, M., Iivari, J., 1995. The effects of self-efficacy on computer usage. Omega, 23(6), 587-605.
Jędrzejka, D., 2019. Robotic process automation and its impact on accounting. Zeszyty Teoretyczne Rachunkowości, (105), 137-166.
Joseph, R., Sharma, R., Sarwar, M. I., Khan, I., Akram, A. S., Alyas, T., Atif, S. & Paramaiah, C., 2023. Triple-Entry Accounting (TEA) and Blockchain Implementation in Accounting and Finance-A Survey. In 2023 International Conference on Business Analytics for Technology and Security (ICBATS) (pp. 1-7). IEEE.
Kokina, J., Davenport, T. H., 2017. The emergence of artificial intelligence: How automation is changing auditing. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 14(1), 115-122.
Kroon, N., do Céu Alves, M., Martins, I., 2021. The impacts of emerging technologies on accountants’ role and skills: Connecting to open innovation—a systematic literature review. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity, 7(3), 163.
Kubina, M., Varmus, M., Kubinova, I., 2015. Use of big data for competitive advantage of company. Procedia Economics and Finance, 26, 561-565.
Laney, D., 2001). 3D data management: Controlling data volume, velocity and variety. META group research note, 6(70), 1.
Lee, Y. W., Strong, D. M., Kahn, B. K., & Wang, R. Y., 2002). AIMQ: a methodology for information quality assessment. Information & management, 40(2), 133-146.
Li, Z., Zheng, L., 2018). The impact of artificial intelligence on accounting. In 2018 4th International Conference on Social Science and Higher Education (ICSSHE 2018). Atlantis Press.
Luo, J., Meng, Q., Cai, Y., 2018). Analysis of the impact of artificial intelligence application on the development of accounting industry. Open Journal of Business and Management, 6(4), 850-856.
Mahraz, M. I., Benabbou, L., Berrado, A., 2019, October). A systematic literature review of digital transformation. In Proceedings of the International Conference on Industrial Engineering and Operations Management (pp. 917-931). IEOM Society.
Martinez, R., 2019. Artificial intelligence: Distinguishing between types & definitions. Nevada Law Journal, 19(3), 9.
McKinsey Global Institute., 2011). Big data: The next frontier for innovation, competition, and productivity. 1-156.
Ajzen, I., 1991). The theory of planned behavior. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211.
Chen, C. J., Wang, C. H., 2009). The effect of information technology integration and lean production on accounting information quality. Journal of Information Science and Engineering, 25(5), 1455-1471.
Compeau, D. R., Higgins, C. A., 1995. Computer self-efficacy: Development of a measure and initial test. MIS Quarterly, 19(2), 189-211.
Davis, F. D., 1989. Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13(3), 319-340.
Lee, Y., Kozar, K. A., Larsen, K. R., 2003. The technology acceptance model: Past, present, and future. Communications of the Association for Information Systems, 12(1), 50-78.
Liu, N., Ye, Z., 2021. Empirical research on the blockchain adoption–based on TAM. Applied Economics, 53(37), 4263-4275.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46(2), 186-204.
Meiryani, Susanto, A., 2018. The Influence of Information Technology on the Quality of Accounting Information System. In Proceedings of the 2018 2nd High Performance Computing and Cluster Technologies Conference (pp. 109-115).
Mihu, C., Pitic, A. G., Bayraktar, D., 2023. Drivers of Digital Transformation and their Impact on Organizational Management. Studies in Business and Economics, 18(1), 149-170.
Monteiro, A. P., García-Sánchez, I. M., & Aibar-Guzmán, B. (2022). Labour practice, decent work and human rights performance and reporting: The impact of women managers. Journal of Business ethics, 180(2), 523-542.
Nunnally, J., 1978. Psychometric Theory. 2nd ed. New York: McGraw-Hill.
OECD, 2021, The Digital Transformation of SMEs. OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/bdb9256a-en.
OWEIS, K. A., 2022. The Relationship Between Accounting Information Systems and Firms Performance: Empirical Evidence from Saudi Arabia. The Journal of Asian Finance, Economics and Business (JAFEB), 9(8), 37-45.
Patten, D. M., 2002. The relation between environmental performance and environmental disclosure: a research note. Accounting, organizations and Society, 27(8), 763-773.
Phomlaphatrachakom, K., 2020. Accounting control system, accounting information quality, value creation, and firm success: An empirical investigation of auto parts businesses in thailand. International Journal of Business, 25(2), 159-177.
Pillai, R., Sivathanu, B., Dwivedi, Y. K. 2020. Shopping intention at AI-powered automated retail stores (AIPARS). Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 57, 102207.
Sagiroglu, S., Sinanc, D., 2013. Big data: A review. In 2013 international conference on collaboration technologies and systems, 42-47.
Sciarelli, M., Prisco, A., Gheith, M. H., Muto, V., 2022. Factors affecting the adoption of blockchain technology in innovative Italian companies: an extended TAM approach. Journal of Strategy and Management, 15(3), 495-507.
Secinaro, S., Dal Mas, F., Brescia, V., Calandra, D., 2021. Blockchain in the accounting, auditing and accountability fields: a bibliometric and coding analysis. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(9), 168-203.
Silva, G. M., Styles, C., Lages, L. F., 2017. Breakthrough innovation in international business: The impact of tech-innovation and market-innovation on performance. International Business Review, 26(2), 391–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibusrev.2016.10.001
Škrinjar, R., Bosilj‐Vukšić, V., Indihar‐Štemberger, M., 2008. The impact of business process orientation on financial and non‐financial performance. Business process management journal, 14(5), 738-754.
Slavinskaitė, N., 2022. Automation of accounting processes: Case study of the companies in Lithuanian. Global Journal of Business, Economics and Management: Current Issues, 12(3), 316-325.
Souza, F., Souza, D., 2011. Formular Questões de Investigação no Contexto do Corpus Latente na Internet. Internet Latent Corpus Journal, 2(1), 2–5.
Spanò, R., Massaro, M., Ferri, L., Dumay, J., Schmitz, J., 2022. Blockchain in accounting, accountability and assurance: an overview. Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 35(7), 1493-1506.
Stancheva-Todorova, E. P., 2018). How artificial intelligence is challenging accounting profession. Journal of International Scientific Publications" Economy & Business, 12, 126-141.
Stolterman, E., Fors, A. C., 2004. Information technology and the good life. Information systems research: relevant theory and informed practice, 687-692.
Straub, E. T., 2009). Understanding technology adoption: Theory and future directions for informal learning. Review of educational research, 79(2), 625-649.
Sutton, S. G., Arnold, V., Holt, M., 2018. How much automation is too much? Keeping the human relevant in knowledge work. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 15(2), 15-25.
Taylor, S., Todd, P., 1995. Assessing IT usage: The role of prior experience. MIS quarterly, 561-570.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., 2000. A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: Four longitudinal field studies. Management science, 46(2), 186-204.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., Davis, F. D., 2003. User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS quarterly, 425-478.
Warren, J. D., Moffitt, K. C., Byrnes, P. (2015). How big data will change accounting. Accounting horizons, 29(2), 397-407.
Westerman, G., Bonnet, D., McAfee, A., 2014. The nine elements of digital transformation. MIT Sloan Management Review, 55(3), 1-6.
Willcocks, L. P., Lacity, M., Craig, A., 2015. Robotic process automation at Xchanging.
Wisna, N., 2013. The Effect of Information Technology on the Quality of Accounting Information system and its impact on the Quality of Accounting Information. Research Journal of Finance and Accounting, 4(15), 2222-2847.
Wongsim, M., Gao, J., 2011. Exploring information quality in accounting information systems adoption. Communications of the IBIMA.
Zhang, C., 2019. Intelligent process automation in audit. Journal of emerging technologies in accounting, 16(2), 69-88.
Zhang, C., Issa, H., Rozario, A., Soegaard, J. S., 2023. Robotic process automation (RPA) implementation case studies in accounting: A beginning to end perspective. Accounting Horizons, 37(1), 193-217.
Zhang, Y., Xiong, F., Xie, Y., Fan, X., Gu, H., 2020. The impact of artificial intelligence and blockchain on the accounting profession. Ieee Access, 8, 110461-110477.
Zikopoulos, P., Eaton, C., 2011. Understanding big data: Analytics for enterprise class hadoop and streaming data. McGraw-Hill Osborne Media.